For solo & small-firm law offices

Qualify prospects before you meet them. Draft boilerplate in minutes. Bill the hours you actually worked.

Solo practitioners and 2-10 attorney firms across general practice, business, estate, and civil litigation. The operational ceiling is almost always administrative, not legal. We raise the ceiling.

Serving North America jurisdiction-specific requirements confirmed during scoping

Small and solo law practices live with a particular math problem. The attorneys are the revenue. Every minute an attorney spends qualifying a prospect who isn't a match, drafting a document from scratch that could be assembled from a template, or reconstructing Tuesday's time entries from memory on Friday, is a minute not spent on billable work. In a solo practice, those minutes are the difference between a good week and a grinding one. In a small firm, they're the difference between the firm growing and the firm stagnating.

The three highest-impact automations for this niche are usually the same, in order: structured intake that qualifies prospects against firm-specific criteria (practice area, geography, conflict check, budget fit) before attorney time is spent; first-draft document assembly for routine work (engagement letters, NDAs, standard motions, discovery requests) with mandatory attorney review; and time-tracking reconstruction that combines email, calendar, and document-activity data into reviewable time entries the attorney approves or edits.

This page is not legal, regulatory, tax, or professional advice. Data handling and jurisdiction-specific requirements are documented in the engagement scope; no control or certification is implied. Read the scoped data-handling approach.

Where a carefully scoped workflow may earn its keep.

  1. 01

    60-80% of intake inquiries aren't matters

    Structured intake that pre-qualifies practice area, conflicts, geography, and budget before attorney time is spent converts attorney intake hours into attorney billable hours.

    Attorney intake time cut 70%+
  2. 02

    Attorneys drafting at $300/hr what paralegals should draft at $85

    Routine documents (NDAs, engagement letters, standard motions, discovery) get drafted by attorneys because there's nobody else. First-draft assembly with attorney review typically saves 4-8 hours per matter on routine categories.

    4-8 hrs saved per routine matter
  3. 03

    Time tracking reconstructed from memory on Friday

    Attorneys consistently under-bill because they rebuild the week from memory. AI-assisted reconstruction from emails, calendar, and document activity typically recovers 5-10% of billable hours.

    5-10% billing uplift
  4. 04

    Client-status inquiries clogging the inbox

    'What's happening with my case?', answered ad-hoc. Matter-status automation (drafted summaries from case activity, attorney reviews before sending) cuts inquiry volume and raises satisfaction.

  5. 05

    Conflict checks and intake compliance paperwork

    Ethics-rule conflict checks and fee agreement generation are rote but mandatory. Automation that assembles and logs the paperwork properly reduces both the chore and the risk of a missed step.

Pattern study

3-attorney general practice: intake and drafting

A three-attorney general practice firm in the Midwest was receiving about 140 intake inquiries per month. Partner intake time averaged 28 minutes per inquiry, and the conversion rate from inquiry to engaged matter was 24%. We built a structured intake that pre-qualified on practice area, conflicts, geography, and budget, and routed only qualified prospects to a partner for a 15-minute fit conversation. Partner intake time dropped to an average of 9 minutes per qualified prospect; conversion from qualified prospect to matter rose because conversations started better-prepared. First-draft document assembly for engagement letters and standard motions saved an additional 5-7 hours per matter on average. The firm's overall capacity rose by roughly one-third without adding attorneys.

Result: Attorney intake time 28 min → 9 min; firm capacity +33%

Estimate the opportunity in your own numbers.

Directional scenario only. This calculator does not validate inputs, estimate implementation cost, provide a quote, or predict a result. Confirm assumptions against your own records.

Questions to resolve before implementation.

Do you work with Clio, MyCase, PracticePanther, Smokeball, or Rocket Matter?

All of them plus smaller platforms.

How do you handle privilege?

The required data handling, vendors, access, review steps, and jurisdiction-specific obligations are identified during scoping and documented in writing. No certification, agreement, hosting model, or technical control should be assumed from this page.

Will an AI draft a brief that gets cited in court?

No. We don't generate case law, we don't auto-file anything, and nothing with legal consequence gets submitted without attorney review. The attorney of record is always responsible.

What about the lawyers who have been disciplined over AI hallucinations?

The pattern in those cases is: attorneys used consumer AI tools ad-hoc, without verification, and cited hallucinated authorities. Our workflows don't generate citations at all; research, when used, is restricted to verified sources and always requires attorney verification before inclusion.

Solo practitioner, is this overkill?

Often not. Solo practices usually have the worst intake-qualification and time-tracking problems, both of which a narrow Nano-Pilot addresses.

Describe what is actually happening in this workflow.

Glen replies in writing with whether a Nano-Pilot fits or the honest answer is “not yet.”

Send a written intake